Currently, there are six volcanoes along the convergent plate boundary that separates the Juan de Fuca and North American plates. While this area is considered to be in the “Ring of Fire” that is notorious for volcanic activity, these major events have occurred in Washington and Alaska. The 1980 Mt. St. Hellens eruption occurred just 400 km from the US Canada border. Mt. Baker, which is just 40 km from the US/Canada border, would be the biggest volcanic risk to the Canadian people in the province of British Columbia.
Mt. Baker experienced a minor eruption in 1870, and
steam can be seen coming from the top peak on a cold day. Although this does not indicate a pending
eruption, this does illustrate that Mt. Baker could erupt someday. While an eruption of Mt. Baker would likely
not cause significant destruction in British Columbia, there would be secondary
effects. A thick layer of ash would
impair the air quality of British Columbia, as well as stress many of their
emergency resources. The risk of volcanic activity is very low, however dramatic seismic activity could change all of that.
http://www.embc.gov.bc.ca/em/hazard_preparedness/volcano/volcano-hazards-in-bc.pdf
https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/mrgnc-mngmnt/ntrl-hzrds/vlcnc-rptn-eng.aspx
http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanoes/baker/baker_geo_hist_115.html
http://www.canadiangeographic.ca/blog/posting.asp?ID=439
Yes, as far as I know, all those Cascade mountains, down to our Shasta/Lassen are 'active' (geologically speaking). meaning they've had some kind of activity in the last 2000 years. These days a lot of researchers are looking closely into Juan de Fuca and its compelx movement. That could trigger quakes, volcanic activity and tsunamis...
ReplyDelete